您所在位置： &
&nbsp&&nbsp&nbsp&&nbsp
最发表stci论文的一些小技巧.doc 23页
本文档一共被下载：
次 ,您可全文免费在线阅读后下载本文档。
下载提示
1.本站不保证该用户上传的文档完整性，不预览、不比对内容而直接下载产生的反悔问题本站不予受理。
2.该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览三)归上传者、原创者。
3.登录后可充值，立即自动返金币，充值渠道很便利
需要金币：150 &&
你可能关注的文档：
··········
··········
发表SCI论文的一些小技巧（I） 精选
已有 4090 次阅读
14:12 |系统分类:科研笔记|关键词:医学论文，翻译，编辑，SCI医学论文，撰写，生物医学
如何发表SCI论文，很多网友都有谈到这个话题，再来说这个话题似乎是老生常谈。所以，今天美捷登编辑剑走偏锋，将SCI论文发表中大家可能比较感兴趣的一些小技巧整理出来，与大家分享。一．SCI论文，并没有想像中的难写1.要熟悉你的专业，实验方法；要尊重结果，实事求是面对结果，下笔之前多看看文献，尤其是国外近期文献。相信只要是正确试验得来的结果都是可以解释的，是可以发表的。2.对于初写者，“抄写”不可避免，妙在“抄写”技巧。同类性质的研究文章，撰写格式大同小异，所以，格式可以“照抄”。常用句型可灵活“抄”用。有些描述性、结论性的句子在读懂的情况下尽量用自己的语言表达和总结。但千万不可照抄未读懂的原句，否则，小者笑话百出，大者断送文章前程。3.尽量使用你熟悉的词汇。不要故意使用华丽、少用或罕见词汇。4.要舍得投入精力和时间。5.文章写成后，一定要请导师、老板、共同作者或者同事审阅，有必要的话也可以请信誉度高的专业服务公司（比如美捷登）把关，提高成功率。二． 如何投稿论文投向哪份杂志其实还是有学问的。一般视课题的新颖及创造性、实验结果的完整及可靠性和论文写作质量而定。如果你有足够的时间（1年以上）等，最好先投比你的目标杂志更高的杂志，哪怕是Lancet, NEJM,JAMA等都不妨一试。这些杂志要么直接拒稿，要么送审后退稿（及少数直接收稿）。前者一般不到一周完成，后者1-2个月。所以即使拒稿，你不会有任何损失，反而有可能收到非常有建设性的意见或建议。要知道，给这则杂志审稿的全非等闲之辈。他们在一针见血提出里文章的“软肋”的同时，往往会提出许多改进论文的良好建议。如果你没有时间等，想让论文一次中的，又不愿“下嫁”你的大作，那么就要费心选择了。首先要正确判断你文章的内容及水平，在从资料库ISI Web of Knowledge??查找相关专业的杂志。再根据杂志刊名，杂志内容，IF及年发表量等选择。进入杂志网站并参考其目录和发表的文章均有助于会杂志的选择。三． 如何选择审稿人?许多杂志编辑希望你推荐3-4名审稿人，并很可能向你推荐的审稿人发审稿邀请。所以推荐审稿人还是有学问的。?如果你推荐的审稿人太忙或者太“牛”，他们根本不会理睬一般杂志的邀请，你的文章就可能不能及时找到审稿人。其实杂志对审稿人的身份要求不是太高的，但审稿人必须是某专业的专家。因此，许多在某专业发过论文的（我指的是英文SCI）的作者都会收到审稿邀请信。因此，你在推荐审稿人时，不必太“挑剔”。建议：1. 推荐国外发过与你结果、结论相似文章的作者；2. 推荐你论文中曾引用论文的作者；3. 推荐你或你老板认识的同专业的教授、副教授。在国际有些影响的国内的学者也可以，这些学者在国内不一定是“牛”人，但深受国外学术界尊重。四．关于撤稿有作者投稿后因种种原因需要撤稿，但又担心编辑不高兴，甚至会被打入黑名单。其实这种担心是没有必要的。但需要说明的是，你为什么要撤稿？材料方法不可靠，结果不能重复，还是设计本身有问题？这都是撤稿的理由。但目前因体制原因国内有许多作者一稿多投，当文章被其中一份杂志接受后，作者就开始要求其他杂志撤稿。此种一稿多投的行为为国外学者所不齿。因为这样会浪费编辑和审稿人的大量时间。五． 如何请国外SCI杂志减免版面费用关于这个问题，其实是有点小窍门的，比如可以减少使用的图片，将彩色变为黑白等等……这里所说的几个问题，可能只是沧海一粟。希望对大家有一点作用。
SCI论文发表心得
已有 1942 次阅读
21:34 |个人分类:SCI论文|系统分类:论文交流|关键词:参考文献 研究生 博士后 生物学 针对性
?对从事生物学、医学与药学专业的研究生而言，能让自己的文章在SCI期刊发表是一种莫大的荣耀。说的世俗一些，一篇SCI论文（哪怕是IF低于1.5分的期刊）会为一名硕士带来不少荣耀。当然了，对博士研究生而言，SCI的IF是关系到其能否顺利毕业的保证。前期在论坛上看到博士毕不了业，对导师以死相逼。究其原因仅仅是因为一纸论文。发表SCI论文真的有那么难吗？笔者看来有实验结果发表SCI论文其实不是一件难事。这里实验结果不一定就是国内的教授们的“首次报道”类的结果。如果你的试验结果可以组织成一个合理的story，完全可以去投稿SCI论文。 1. 论文写作论文写作非一日之功。前期要阅读大量文献，并将阅读文献做一个小记，这样不会出现读完后一点儿印象都没有。更重要
正在加载中，请稍后...
36页61页70页12页50页12页77页71页11页71页No such appImpact Challenge Day 16: Post your preprints - 推酷
Impact Challenge Day 16: Post your preprints
Today, we’ll expand on
to cover how you can make your article preprints available online.
“Publishing” your preprints has been
, and it’s
, too. It’s easy to see why: publishing preprints gets your work out right away, while still letting you publish the formally peer-reviewed version later. That has some big advantages:
You establish intellectual precedence for your ideas
You can start accumulating citations right away
You can get early feedback from colleagues
It helps research in your field move more quickly
In today’s challenge, we’ll correct some common misconceptions about sharing preprints, and discuss your options for where to post them. Let’s get down to it!
Preprints – facts vs. fiction
FACT: Posting preprints makes your research freely available to all
You can get the “prestige” of publishing with certain toll-access journals while still archiving your work in places where the public and other scholars can access it. That access means that others can cite your work before its been formally published, getting you more citations. (More on that in a moment.) More importantly, that access fulfills your duty to science and humankind: to advance knowledge for all.
FICTION: Journals won’t publish your work if it’s already been posted online
It’s a common misconception that if you post your preprints online before they’ve been published, most journals won’t allow you to publish it formally, citing “prior publication.” As ecologist Ethan White
The vast majority of publication outlets do not believe that preprints represent prior publication, and therefore the publication ethics of the broader field of academic publishing clearly allows this. In particular Science, Nature, PNAS, the Ecological Society of America, the Royal Society, Springer, and Elsevier all generally allow the posting of preprints.
And some publishers (
, among others) even encourage the posting of preprints! You can check
to find out what the policies are for your journal of choice. If you’re still unsure, contact your journal’s editors for more information.
FACT: Preprints can accumulate citations that traditional articles can’t
A major advantage to preprints is the speed with which they can accumulate citations. Scientists
. Would you prefer that others didn’t cite your preprint, and waited for the final copy? That’s as easy as adding a warning to the header of your article (as we see
FICTION: You’ll get scooped
Some worry that if their results are online before publication, others will be able to scoop them by publishing a similar study. Yet,
, and in fact having a digital footprint that proves you’ve established intellectual precedence can prevent scooping.
As paleontologist Mike Taylor
, “I can’t think of anyone who would be barefaced enough to scoop [something] that had already been published on arXiv…If they did, the whole world would know unambiguously exactly what had happened.”
FACT: Preprints can advance science much more rapidly than traditional publishing can
By posting your preprints, others can
, accelerating science and discovery. &After all, it can take years for papers to be published after their acceptance. And that can lead to situations like
We wrote the bulk of the neck-anatomy paper back in 2008 — the year that we first submitted it to a journal. In the four years since then, all the observations and deductions that it contains have been unavailable to the world. And that is stupid.
Preprints will help you avoid four year (!) publication delays.
FACT: Preprints aren’t rigorously peer reviewed
It’s 100% true that most preprints aren’t peer reviewed beyond a simple sanity check before going online for the world to see. It’s possible that the lack of peer review means that
, leading to confusion or misinformation down the line. (Of course, peer-reviewed work is also often
–no one’)) &&A great tool to manage the versions of a paper, including preprints, is
, which was invented to provide an easy-to-find breadcrumb trail that leads from the preprint to the peer-reviewed paper to any subsequent, corrected versions of the paper.
FACT: Feedback on your work, before you submit it
If you’re posting your work to a disciplinary preprint server where your colleagues are likely to read it, you can
ahead of submitting your article for publication. As genomics researcher Nick Loman
[I find very useful] the benefits of publishing to a self-selected audience who are genuinely interested in this subject, and actively wish to read and critique such papers out of professional curiosity, not just because they are lucky/unlucky enough to be selected as peer reviewers.
And even if your work is already in press,
, rather than months (or years) later when the paper is finally published.
Where to post preprints
Options abound for posting your preprints. Note that some of the following options are considered commercial repositories, and thus might not be eligible for use under some publishers’ conditions.
A popular, discipline-agnostic, commercial repository that’s free to use and has a
. Figshare issues DOIs for content it hosts, offers altmetrics (views and shares) to help you track the readership and interest in your preprint, and requires CC-BY licenses for publicly accessible preprints. Figshare’s commenting feature allows for easy, public feedback on your work.
One downside to Figshare is that
amongst all the other data, posters, and other scholarly outputs that are shared on the site, from many different disciplines. It’s also a for-profit venture, meaning it wouldn’t meet the non-commercial requirement that some journals have for preprints.
PeerJ PrePrints
A preprint server for the biomedical sciences that’s closely integrated with the Open Access journal, PeerJ. PeerJ PrePrints is free to use and
due to its sleek submission interface and the availability of altmetrics. PeerJ PrePrints also offers a commenting feature for feedback.
Like Figshare, PeerJ PrePrints will not meet the “non-commercial” requirement that some journals have for how preprints are shared.
ArXiv is one of the
and most famous preprint servers, and it serves mostly the physics, maths, and computational science communities. It’s a non-profit venture run by Cornell University Library, meaning it meets the “non-commercial” requirement of some publishers. By virtue of being a disciplinary repository, it’s a good place to post your work so that others in your field will read it.
Two drawbacks of ArXiv are that it’s not often used by those outside of physics and its other core disciplines, and that it doesn’t offer altmetrics, making it impossible to know the extent to which your work has been viewed and downloaded on the platform.
Ethan White has
; check it out for more preprint server options.
For today’s homework, you’re going to do some due diligence. Use
to learn what journals in your discipline allow pre-publication archiving, and do some thinking on how you can share your next study prior to publication. That way, when you write your next article, you’ve got a preprint server in mind for it, so you can share it as quickly as possible.
And if you didn’t finish uploading preprints for articles you’ve already published (your homework from yesterday), upload them today. The more content you’ve got online and freely available, the more everyone benefits!
Tomorrow: ORCID identifiers to collect and claim your articles, datasets, and more. Stay tuned!
已发表评论数()
请填写推刊名
描述不能大于100个字符!
权限设置： 公开
仅自己可见
正文不准确
标题不准确
排版有问题
主题不准确
没有分页内容
图片无法显示
视频无法显示
与原文不一致}