欢迎来到51Due，请先
关注我们：
Essay代写范文
为您解决留学中生活、学习、工作的困难、疑惑
当前位置：
Write the argumentation essay-The general glut controversy i--英国论文代写范文精选
来源:51Due教员组 |
类别：Essay代写范文
Write the argumentation essay The General Glut Controversy 207 years onThe general glut controversy is an ancient feud. It arises from a seemingly absurd question: &Can there be too much of everything?& Until the 1930s the respectable answer was &No&; from the mid 1930s to the 1970s it was mostly &Yes&; then &No& again during the 1980s and 1990s; the early 2000s was &Maybe&; and after 2007 to the present time again &Yes&.The question is subtle, misunderstood by almost everyone, and of profound importance to many questions of economic policy. Most recently the debate over &stimulus" was implicitly a debate over gluts, though few realised it.I propose to give a simple account of the glut question, and I expect to fail.Consider a two person, two good exchange economy. This is what it sounds like: there are two people (we will call them Alice and Bob) who produce two goods (apples and bananas). Alice and Bob exchange apples and bananas at some ratio and choose levels of production to maximise their happiness as they see it.In this scenario there might at some point be a surplus of apples or bananas: Alice might produce more apples than Bob is willing to buy at the prevailing exchange ratio.For one reason or other Alice does not sell the apples at a discount (accept fewer bananas for each apple). She either stores the apples or lets them waste. In this case there is a &glut& of apples.There is a glut of apples but also, and equivalently, there is a shortage of bananas. This follows since there are only two uses for apples: eating them or exchanging them for bananas. Bob did not produce enough bananas to exchange at the prevailing ratio.It is important that this occurs at the prevailing apple/banana exchange ratio. We assume that prices do not adjust to balance demand and supply, at least in the short run.In this example it is very clear that a surplus of one good is identically a shortage of another. The same logic would hold if we introduced Carol to produce Cumquats, Dorian to produce dates, and Edward to produce eggplants: there might be a glut in a particular good but it would imply a shortage in others. Overall, gluts and shortages balance out. There cannot be to there can only be too much of some things and too little of others. There are no general gluts.There are a number of equivalent ways to make this statement: &Aggregate demand equals aggregate supply at all price levels&, &There cannot be a deficiency in aggregate demand&, &There cannot be involuntary unemployment.&Now we introduce money and things change a little. Say that it becomes convenient for Alice and Bob (and Carol and Dorian) to use money for their transactions. Money is a good that has no value except in exchange. The same is true of most wedding gifts. People exchange goods for money and then later exchange money for goods.Good. So what effect does money have?There still cannot be a general glut, but there can be a surplus in all goods (apples and bananas) relative to money. At some point Alice might want to hold on to a larger amount of money & to save more. If less money is produced than Alice desires at a certain level of prices then there is a glut of goods (and a shortage of money).This can be bad for a number of reasons. If Alice hoards money she will not purchase bananas. Bob will not be able to sell his bananas so he will reduce production. He also now has less money to buy apples, so Alice will sell fewer apples. And so it goes. This is known as the paradox of thrift: By saving Alice reduces demand for goods and causes a reduction in output (a recession).There are two main &market" solutions to this problem. One is to wait for the value of money to adjust (money needs to be worth more against goods). If this happens t money costs more and so Alice will hold less money and more bananas.The second solution is for Alice to lend her savings to Bob so he can afford to buy apples from her. She might just as well sell him the apples on credit. If she does lend money to Bob she actually creates money in a certain sense because the loan itself can be used as money. (Bob writes &I owe Alice $10& on a piece of paper and Alice uses the piece of paper to purchase dates from Dorian. Meanwhile Bob uses the money to purchase apples from Alice.)There are also two main non-market solutions. One is to take the money from Alice and spend it on bananas. Then Bob never needs to reduce his production and will have enough money to buy apples from Alice. This is called &fiscal policy".The other solution is to increase the amount of money. The new money can either be spent directly by a third party (let"s call him Gerald) or lent on favourable terms to Bob to buy from Alice. This is called &monetary policy".Which solution is best? It depends.It depends mostly on how quickly the market mechanisms work. Alice would probably be wise to lend her savings to Bob. She could be convinced to lend at a sufficiently high rate of interest, and things would start getting better. Even if she didn"t it might not be so bad. The price of money would naturally increase (the price of goods would go down). This is &deflation".On the other hand these mechanisms might not work. Alice might be fearful of Bob"s creditworthiness and so not lend to him (apples or money). The increase in the price of money (deflation) might also create some uneasiness. The price adjustment process will be tricky because it is difficult for Alice and Bob to distinguish between a broad price decrease against money & which does not affect the correct level of production & and a change in the relative price of apples and bananas & which does.If Alice lends to Bob money at a high interest rate that can be bad too. The rate of interest determines the demand for loans. If production is already depressed an increased interest rate will make things worse, at least in the short run.On the other hand the non-market solutions also have problems. If we take money from Alice to spend on Bob"s bananas she won"t have that money to spend on Cumquats, or to lend to Edward to finance his new eggplant farm. Maybe these were better uses of her money. Similarly, pushing up the price of bananas means Bob will spend more time producing bananas at the expense of his other activities. Maybe he will buy some land from Carol to expand his banana farm. We might end up with lots of bananas and little else. This unfortunate side effect of fiscal policy is called &crowding out" & Bob"s increased banana production comes at the expense of production and consumption of other things.Increasing the amount of money also has problems. Ideally the increase would not affect relative prices: everything would just get cheaper and the goods glut would be solved by a manufactured glut of Write the argumentation essay money. But more likely the prices of some goods will increase before others, particularly if the new money is not distributed proportionally to everyone. Creating new money devalues old money. The increase in money is costly for Alice, who will find her savings can be exchanged for fewer bananas than before.We have expanded our example to a fairly general setting. There are many goods and people, production, a credit market, a government (Gerald), a factor market (for land), a central bank. In our story sticky prices for bananas and a precautionary money demand from Alice caused a recession. It"s debatable whether this was a general glut. If you count money as part of the economy it isn"t, if you don"t then it is.There are four possible responses in this situation: (1) the market expands the money supply organically (Alice supplies credit), (2) the market reprices money in terms of goods (money becomes more expensive, goods cheaper), (3) the money supply is increased, or (4) money is taken from Alice and used to buy Bob"s bananas.Back to realityThis story is not too different to Keynes"s motivating example for his General Theory. He argued that at the start of the 1930s British wages had failed to adjust downwards, in part due to strong labour unions. This meant that workers could not profitably be hired at the prevailing wages. These involuntarily unemployed workers earned no money and so were unable to consume goods produced by other firms who then had to fire their workers and so forth. This was in Keynes"s view a central cause of the Great Depression.Keynes"s solution for this situation was twofold. First, the government should print money to create inflation. Inflation reduces the real (inflation adjusted) wages and induces firms to hire more workers. The cause of the problem is wages not adjusting correctly (price stickiness) and the solution is for the government to change the price by decreasing the value of money relative to goods and services (inflation).Second, the government should hire the unemployed workers. The type of work is not p the point is to get money into worker"s pockets so they could spend again.Keynes combined the two solutions in an ingenious scheme: he proposed that the government print money and bury it in a secret location. A mining industry would develop to discover the buried treasure, hiring the unemployed and increasing the money supply in the process.Keynes was very influential at the time and his recommendations were introduced (though lamentably never burying the money supply underground). The recovery was slow, but it happened eventually. In America, Roosevelt"s New Deal programs began in 1933 (Hoover was already running substantial budget deficits from 1929) and the recovery inemployment came in 1939. A new generation of Keynesian economists and politicians were quick to take the credit and the first golden era of Keynesian demand management had begun.Faith in Keynesianism was shaken when, during the golden era, inflation blew out growth slowed. To the surprise of many, high inflation coexisted with high unemployment and low growth & this came to be called &stagflation" (unemployment + inflation). High inflation also led to high interest rates as lenders insisted on being compensated for the lower value of future repayments.The worm turned eventually. Paul Volker became chairman of the US Federal Reserve in 1979 with inflation well above 10% and unemployment at 7.5%. He set about a savage reduction in the money supply. The federal funds rate reached 20% and the unemployment rate 10.3% in 1981. But by 1983 inflation was down to 3.2%. Interest rates dropped too and a recovery in employment and production followed eventually.After the early 1980s monetary restraint became conventional wisdom. Although the Federal Reserve never adopted an explicit inflation targeting framework (unlike the central banks of Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and others) price stability is now central to their decisions.The
recession was of a slightly different sort. Innovations in the financial markets had created a very large and interdependent credit market. Concerns over the value of some commonly traded loans (particularly residential mortgages) led to an abrupt and unexpected freeze of the interbank lending market. Banks became worried about the solvency of their counterparties and so cut back lending. Banks who could no longer borrow from each other stopped lending to companies. Several large banks collapsed or were nationalised, many others came close. The same happened with other large companies. The US S&P 500 index declined from 1565 to 676 between September 2007 and March 2009.The government response was textbook Keynesian. Central banks increased lending and cut lending rates. This increase in the money supply was targeted to offset the decease in the money supply caused by the decreased lending. There was, in the opinion of policy-makers, a glut in assets and a shortage of money to buy them.The US government began an aggressive program of purchasing loans from private banks. Residential mortgages and corporate loans were purchased for cash and in large size. This was part fiscal policy, part monetary policy. The money to purchase the loans was created, and in that sense it wasordinary monetary expansion. But the money was used to buy assets (loans) which had depressed market prices. Direct purchases by government are usually considered fiscal policy, but in this case they were a bit of both.There were also more traditional fiscal policies. Increases in unemployment benefits (both size and duration) were common internationally, as was increased spending on infrastructure projects and other government spending that could be bought forward quickly. Again, the rationale is the existence general glut. Savers are rationally thrifty in uncertain times, but their thriftiness decreases spending, which in turn decreases production and employment. If money is taken either through current taxes, future taxes (borrowing), or inflation (money printing) and spent by the government the cycle can be averted.The apparent stabilization of the world economy in 2010 is widely viewed as a victory for the Keynesians. As in the 1940s Keynesian economists and policymakers are claiming vindication for their ideas and heralding a new era of demand management. As with Great Depression, not even time will tell for sure. It is impossible to know the counterfactual: what might have happened without the stimulus?But there are many voices of discontent. Large scale involvement in the economy can be damaging in a number of ways. Both fiscal and monetary policy have the capacity to shift production in the economy towards less valuable output. Government programs can crowd out investment and consumption in unpredictable ways. Monetary expansion will be inf in the short run it will punish savers. Whether or not the recovery truly was purchased with spending, the spending must be paid back. Governments have taken on unprecedented levels of debt to fund t in the years ahead it must be repaid, hopefully with the proceeds of a recovery, but nonetheless.More generally, it is possible that governments might misdiagnose a general glut. Asset bubbles occur in the economy and when they burst, as they must, there is a level of economic distress. As inflated Write the argumentation essay asset prices return to earth investors will learn that the wealth they believed they had was illusory. Many will be unable to repay their loans and their creditors, too, will have to adjust to a poorer world. But the adjustment is for the good. A recovery reallocates the resources that were devoted to the bubble. Capital is re-lent, labour is re-trained, and entrepreneurial visions are re-envisioned. If the government programs serve to maintain the bubble prices any recovery will be a mirage. Eventually prices will readjust, and the delayed misery will return with interest.
我们的优势
05年成立，已帮助上万人
24小时专业客服
团队成员都毕业于全球著名高校
保证原创，支持检测
51Due英国站
Copyright (C) Due英国论文代写平台 All Rights Reserved500 Internal Server Error
500 Internal Server Error> 【答案带解析】Does this situation seem familiar to you...
Does this situation seem familiar to you？Your English is progressing well，the grammar is now familiar，the reading comprehension is no problem，and you are speaking quite fluently.____1__
First of all，remember that
you are not alone. Listening is probably the most difficult job for almost all
learners of English as a foreign language.
The most important thing is to listen as often as
possible.___2____
The Internet is really a useful tool for English
students. You can download The RealPlayer . The RealPlayer
allows you to use the Internet like a radio station.
Once you have begun to listen on a regular basis，you might still be frustrated by limited
understanding._____3____
Here is some of the advice I give my students：
•Accept the fact that you are not going to understand
everything.
•Stay relaxed when you do not understand，and try listening to the material for more times.
•Do not translate everything into your native
language.
•_____4_____Don’t concentrate on details before you
have understood the main ideas.
•Listen to something you enjoy.
I remember the problems I had in understanding spoken
German when I first went to Germany. In the beginning，when I didn’t understand a word，I insisted on translating it in my mind. This method
usually resulted in confusion._____5_____Firstly，translating
creates a barrier between the listener and the speaker. Secondly，most people repeat themselves constantly. By remaining
calm，I noticed that even if I didn’t pay much attention
I could usually understand what the speaker had said.
A．But you can’t follow a
native English speaker at all!
B．What should you do?&
C．But listening is a
problem for most of the beginners!
D．However，after several weeks，I got used to
the new environment in Germany.
E．So，what you need to do is to find listening resources.
F．Then，after the first six months，I discovered two extremely important facts.
G．Listen for the general
idea of the conversation.
试题分析：
题意 你的英语进步很大，语法也不错，阅读理解也很好，你也说得很流利，但你根本听不懂当地人所说的话。根据下文First of all，remember that you are not alone. Listening is probably the most dif...
考点分析：
考点1：七选五题型
& & &该类题型要求从短文后的七个选项中（均为完整的句子）选出五个能填入文章空处的最佳选项，主要考查考生对文章的整体内容和结构以及上下文逻辑意义的理解和掌握。其命题形式深受英语四六级和考研阅读多项选择题的影响，体现了《新课标》“用英语获取、处理和运用信息的能力；逐步获取用英语思维的能力。”的阅读学习和教学理念。该题型命题形式仍然具有客观题的特点，又与完形填空具有异曲同工之妙，只是选项少，以句子形式出现，考查目的和侧重点不完全相同而已。&
& & 从《考试说明》对该题型命题目的的表述“主要考查考生对文章的整体内容和结构以及上下文逻辑意义的理解和掌握。”可以得出以下判断：该题备选项可分为主旨概括句（文章整体内容）、过渡性句子（文章结构）和注释性句子（上下文逻辑意义）三类。其多余的两个干扰项也往往从这三方面进行设置，例如主旨概括句或过于宽泛或以偏概全或偏离主题，过渡性句子不能反映文章的行文结构，注释性句子与上文脱节等。
【题型分析】
& & 分析篇章结构，把握全篇文脉是阅读填空题解题的关键，英语的语篇（discourse）通常是由句子和语段（sentence group）构成的，语段是句子和语篇之间的中间层次，句子虽然能够单独地表达相对完整的思想，但是它不能表达多方面的、比较复杂的思想，只有把几个句子结合为较大的言语片段，才能表达一个相对独立的层意，所谓的“积句而成章，积章而成篇。”就是这个道理。
& & 分析文章的层次包含两种形式：一种是分析整篇文章的层次，也就是段落，另一种是分析每一个段落内部的层次，也就是语篇层次。
& & 语篇与段落是有区别的，语段是篇章结构的中间层次，是由句子到篇的一种过渡形式，段落（paragraph）是在某些语体（如记叙文、议论文）中比语段更大的意义单位，较小的段落可以只包括一个语段或一个句子，一般来说，一个段落通常由几个语段构成。构成语段的方式有两种，一是靠句际间意义的结合，二是靠句际间的关联词，逻辑性插入语来连接，在分析语段层次时，可以借助句际间的连接词语作出判断，但最主要的还是要真正体会句际间的意义关系，把握作者的思路，从语序上去发现断续点，理清层次，好文章的层次非常清晰，只有层层入手，才能真正理解文章。
相关试题推荐
A well-dressed man entered a famous jewelry shop. He
explained that he wished to buy a pearl for his wife’ s birthday. The price
didn’t matter, since business had been very good for him that year. After
examining a nice black one that costs $5, 000, he paid for the pearl in cash,
shook hands with the jeweler, and left.
&& A few days later the man returned and
said that his wife liked the pearl so much that she wanted another one just
like it. It had to be exactly the same size and quality as she wanted a pair of
earrings made. &Can you give me any advice on how to get such a
pearl?& said the man. The jeweler regretfully replied, &I would say
it’s exactly impossible to find one exactly like that pearl.&
&& The rich man insisted that the jeweler
advertise in the newspapers, offering $25,000 for the matching pearl. Many
people answered the advertisement but nobody had a pearl that was just right.
&& Just when the jeweler had given up hope,
a little old lady came into his store. To his great surprise, she pulled the
perfect pearl from her purse.& & I don’t like to part with it.&
she said sadly,& I got it from my mother, and ,my mother& got it from
her’ s. But I really need the money.
&& The jeweler was quickly to pay her before
she changed her mind .Then he called the rich man’s hotel to tell him the good
news .The man ,however ,was nowhere to be found.
1.The man said he wanted to buy a pearl for _____ .
A. his wife&&&&& B. his
mother-in-law&&& C. his own mother&&&& D. no
one
2.He paid $5,000 for the black pearl without
bargaining (讨价还价) because______.
A. he was very rich.
B. he wanted to make the jeweler believe him
C. he was anxious to get it
D. his business had been successful
3. He told the jeweler to get him another pearl that
must be______.
A. exactly the same size as the black one
B. exactly the same quality as the black one
C. worth more than $25,000
D. exactly as big and nice as the black one
4. Many people answer the advertisement because they
wanted______.
A. to see the perfect pearl
B. to buy some beautiful pearl too
C. to get in touch with the rich man
D. to sell their own pearl at a high price
5.The jeweler couldn’t find the man anywhere because
______.
A. he died suddenly
B. he happened to be out
C. he got $20,000 by cheating and had run away with
the money
D. he wouldn’t show up until the jeweler called him a
second time
In some Western countries, there are many
opportunities for adults who want to improve their lives. There are public
schools you can attend. In the schools, you can take things like English,
arithmetic, and history. You can find classes in almost any subject you want to
study. You may want to learn to type, sew, paint, or fix TV sets. You may want
to learn more about trade you are already in. You may want to learn a new
trade. You may want to get a high school diploma. You may even want to go to
college. All it takes is time and effort.
In many cities, there are adult classes in the public
schools. You can attend many of these classes without having to pay money. In
some schools you may have to pay a small fee. There are also many kinds of
private schools for adults.
In addition to schools, many industries and unions
conduct on-the-job training programs. In these programs you hear about new
ideas and learn new skills. Many large companies will send a worker to school
if he or she has ability.
Many job opportunities are offered to those who wish
to work. It helps if you know more than one language. There are good jobs for
interpreters and typists who know English and another language.
There are many good jobs in government. In most cases,
you must be a citizen of this country, and you must take a civil service
examination. These examinations are open to everyone, regardless of race,
religion, or color.
For many civil service jobs you need a high school
diploma. The person who does not have a high school diploma can get one. There
are several ways. You can study high school subjects at home and then take
special tests. If you pass the tests, then you get a diploma. Or you can go to
night school. There are classes that prepare you to take special tests to earn
a diploma.
You can attend a night school that grants a high
school diploma if you complete certain courses. If you do this, you do not have
to take the special test.
Be as well trained as you can. Get as much training as
you can. Opportunity knocks at every door. Be sure that when it knocks at your
door you are ready.
1.According to the article, if you want to live a
better life, you have to get__________.
A. some time&& B. an
education&&& C. new ideas&& D. new jobs
2.In many places, public schooling for adults is
____________________.
A. difficult&&& B.
easy&&& C. free&&& D. new
3.What does this article tell us?
A. Civil service jobs are offered to everyone.
B. Only a citizen can apply for a government job.
C. Training programs are often poorly organized.
D. Large companies will send most of their workers to
school.
4.We can see that___________________________________.
A. well-trained people are often out of work
B. typists who know English earn much more money
C. one can work on a high school diploma at home
D. the person without a high school diploma can also
get a civil service job
5.The purpose of adults’ going to night school is
to_______________.
A. take special
tasks&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
B. complete certain courses
C. get more
training&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
D. get a diploma
Few Americans remain in one position or one place for
a lifetime. We move from town to city to suburb, from high school to college in
a different state, from a job in one region to a better job elsewhere, from the
home where we raise our children to the home where we plan to live in
retirement. With each move we are forever making new friends, who become part
of our new life at that time.
For many of us summer is a special time for forming
new friendships. Today millions of Americans vacation abroad, and they go not
only to see new sights but also with the hope of meeting new people. No one
really expects a vacation trip to produce a close friend, but the beginning of
a friendship is possible.
The word “friend ” can be applied to a wide range of
relationships ---- to someone one has known for a few weeks in a new place, to
a fellow worker, to a childhood playmate, to a man or woman, to a trusted
confidant.
1.Many Americans move from place to place for the
following reasons except______.
A. going to
college&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
B. getting a better job
C. finding a place to live in
retirement&&&&&& D. saving money
2.Summer is a special time when many Americans_____.
A. enjoy the sunlight&&&& B. feel
strange&&& C. travel to other countries&& D. get a new
job
3.When summer comes, many Americans _________.
A. hope to meet new people
B. expect to find some close friends
C. want to begin lasting friendships with new people
D. Both A and B
4.From the passage it can be seen that a “friend” can
be ______.
A. a fellow worker&&&& B. a
football teammate&&&& C. a boy or a
girl&&&& D. all of the above
5.Which of the following is the topic sentence of the
second paragraph?
A. For many of us summer is a special time for forming
new friendships.
B. Today millions of Americans vacation abroad.
C. No one really expects a vacation trip to produce a
close friendship.
D. But surely the beginning of friendship is possible.
I still remember my first day in the U.S. very
clearly. My friend was waiting for me when my plane landed at Kennedy Airport
at three o’clock in the afternoon. The weather was very &&&&&and
it was snowing, but I was too excited to &&&&&&_.
From the airport, my friend and I &&&&&&&a
taxi to my &&&&&&&&&. On
the way I saw the skyline of Manhattan for the &&&&&&_time
and I stared in surprise at the famous skyscrapers and their man-made&&&
&&&&. Helping me unpack at the hotel, my friend left
and &&&&&&to return the next day.
&&& &&&&&&&my
friend had left, I went to a &&&&&near the
hotel to get something to eat. Since I couldn’t speak a single &&&&&of
English, I couldn’t tell the &&&&&&what I
wanted. I was very upset and started to make some &&&,
but he didn’t understand me. Finally, I ordered the same thing the man at the
next table was &&&&&. After dinner, I started
to walk along Broadway &&&&&&I came to
Times Square with its theatres, neon lights, and crowds of people. I didn’t
feel tired, so I &&&&&&to walk around the
city. I wanted to see &&&&_on my first day, although
I knew it was impossible.
& When I& &&&to the
hotel, I couldn’t fall asleep, lay& &&&and thought
about New York. It was a very big and amazing city with many high-rise
buildings and streams of cars, and full of &&&&&and
busy people. I also decided right then that I had to learn to &&&&&&English.
1.A.hot&&&&& B.&&&&& warm&&&&&&&& C.&&&&& cold& D.&&&&& cool&&&&&&&&&&
2.A.look&&& B.&&&&& listen&&&&&&&& C.&&&&& enjoy&&&&&&&& D.&&&&& mind&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
3.A.sat&&&&&& B.&&&&& took C.&&&&& rode D.&&&&& used&&&&&&&&&
4.A. home&&&&&&&&& B.&&&&& hotel&&&&&&&& C.&&&&& office&&&&&&& D.&&&&& school&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
5.A. first&&& B.&&&&& one& C.&&&&& last&& D.&&&&& only&&&&&&&&&&
6.A.satellites&&&& B.&&&&& lakes&&&&&&&&& C.&&&&& beauty&&&&& D.&&&&& parks&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
7.A.advised&&&&&& B.&&&&& liked C.&&&&& promised& D.&&&&& hoped&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
8.A.Before long&&&&&&&& B.&&&&& Shortly
after&&&&& C.&& Soon&&&&&&&&& D.&
Then
9.A.restaurant& B.&&&&& shop C.&&&&& supermarket&&&& D.&&&&& pub&&&&&&&&&&&
10.A.letter&&&&&&&& B.&&&&& word&&&&&&&& C.&&&&& sentence& D.&&&&& phrase&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
11.A. boss&&&&&&&&& B.&&&&& cook C.&&&&& waiter&&&&&& D.&&&&& waitress&&&&&&&&&&&&
12.A.voices&&&&&& B.&&&&& suggestions&&&&&& C.&&&&& sounds&&&&& D.&&&&& gestures&&&&&&&&&&&&
13.A.looking&&&&& B.&&&&& ordering&& C.&&&&& picking&&&&& D.&&&&& eating&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
14.A. until&&&&&&&&& B.&&&&& when&&&&&&&& C.&&&&& before&&&&& D.&&&&& after&&&&&&&&&
15.A.tried B.&&&&& stopped&&& C.&&&&& decided&&& D.&&&&& continued&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
16.A.anything&& B.&&&&& everything&&&&&&&& C.&&&&& something&&&&&&&& D.&&&&& some
things&&&&&&
17.A.came&&&&&&&& B.&&&&& went&&&&&&&&& C.&&&&& returned& D.&&&&& arrived&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
18.A.asleep&&&&&& B.&&&&& awake&&&&&& C.&&&&& afraid&&&&&&& D.&&&&& alive&&&&&&&&&
19.A.noise&&&&&&&& B.&&&&& voices&&&&&& C.&&&&& streets&&&&& D.&&&&& places&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
20.A.say&&& B.&&&&& talk&& C.&&&&& speak&&&&&&& D.&&&&& tell&&&&&&&&&&&&
— Do you think the film is good?
— Terrific! ______
A. It couldn’t be better.&&&& B.
It could be better.&&&
C. It is still better.&&&&&& D.
It couldn’t be worse.
题型：其他题
难度：中等
Copyright @
满分5 学习网 . All Rights Reserved.}